|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Sql Management Studio - Script Db creates objects out of ourderDon't know if this is the best place to post this but I have a db with about
100 tables and a number of views and sprocs. When scripting the entire db using SMS, a number of the views and sprocs are created before their associated underlying tables are. Can anyone shine a bit of light on this issue? I am guessing that it is a common one since I have seen it a number of times. I have also tried the new Database Deployment Wizard RC and it generates scripts with the same issue. Guessing that maybe this has something to do with my db? Thanks, > Don't know if this is the best place to post this but I have a db with In the short term, I would suggest creating the tables first, and then > about 100 tables and a number of views and sprocs. When scripting the > entire db using SMS, a number of the views and sprocs are created before > their associated underlying tables are. Can anyone shine a bit of light on > this issue? I am guessing that it is a common one since I have seen it a > number of times. > > I have also tried the new Database Deployment Wizard RC and it generates > scripts with the same issue. Guessing that maybe this has something to do > with my db? creating the objects that interface with them. Other than that, I would check connect.microsoft.com/sql/ for a reported issue, and either vote or file a new one. A Andrew Robinson (nemoby@nospam.nospam) writes:
> Don't know if this is the best place to post this but I have a db with Scripting depends on the dependency information in the database. Given the> about 100 tables and a number of views and sprocs. When scripting the > entire db using SMS, a number of the views and sprocs are created before > their associated underlying tables are. Can anyone shine a bit of light > on this issue? I am guessing that it is a common one since I have seen > it a number of times. > > I have also tried the new Database Deployment Wizard RC and it generates > scripts with the same issue. Guessing that maybe this has something to do > with my db? flexible nature of SQL Server, this information may be incomplete. If you create a table nissetbl, and the a stored procedure kalle_sp that refers to nissetbl, SQL Server with store information about this. But if you now drop and recreate nissetbl, this information is lost. When you recreate nissetbl, it would be kind of expensive to examine 5000 stored procedures to see if they might refer to nissetbl. Also, keep in mind that SQL Server to permits you to create kalle_sp before nissetbl exists at all. Thus, the only way to get you generated script correctly is to generate the database correctly from the beginning. ...or at least it was up to SP2 of SQL 2005, which introduces a system procedure, sp_refreshsqlmodule which updates the dependency information for a stored procedure or similar. SP2 for SQL 2005 has not been released yet, but a preview (aka CTP) is available. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esq***@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx |
|||||||||||||||||||||||