|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IIS7 and .NET 3.5I installed Visual Studio 2008 Express earlier today, but I am not sure that IIS7 has been correctly configured to be able to use the 3.5 Framework. When I look at the AppPools listed in IIS7, I see two AppPools that are both set to use v2.0, and when attempting to create a new one, v3.5 simply isn't shown as an available Framework. Am I missing something (ie. the plot!), or is this just how it is? Cheers, -- Dylan Parry http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own. > When I look at the AppPools listed in IIS7, I see two AppPools that I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the CLR version > are both set to use v2.0, and when attempting to create a new one, > v3.5 simply isn't shown as an available Framework. > > Am I missing something (ie. the plot!), or is this just how it is? which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework. -- Rory Rory Becker wrote:
> I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the CLR version Ah. Then I'm not losing the plot :) Cheers. So presumably, although I am> which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework. writing code in C# 3.0, the resulting DLL files are "ran" in the same CLR as was installed for .NET 2.0 (and then 3.0)? -- Dylan Parry http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own. >> I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the Thats the way I understand it.>> CLR version which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework. >> > Ah. Then I'm not losing the plot :) Cheers. So presumably, although I > am writing code in C# 3.0, the resulting DLL files are "ran" in the > same CLR as was installed for .NET 2.0 (and then 3.0)? It's also this that allows you to use many of the new language features (extention methods etc) and still target 2.0. The exceptions to this are things like linq which require library support as well. -- Rory "Dylan Parry" <use***@dylanparry.com> wrote in message C# 3.0?news:fhv3n0.5ok.1@dylanparry.com... > Rory Becker wrote: > >> I *think* this should be correct. The version you talk about is the CLR >> version >> which is still v2.0 with the 3.5 framework. > > Ah. Then I'm not losing the plot :) Cheers. So presumably, although I am > writing code in C# 3.0, AlieN wrote:
> C# 3.0? Actually I meant C# 3 without the point-oh. Fingers going faster thanthe brain. -- Dylan Parry http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own. Dylan Parry <use***@dylanparry.com> wrote:
> > C# 3.0? Some people do put the ".0" in for various versions of C#. In theory > > Actually I meant C# 3 without the point-oh. Fingers going faster than > the brain. the version of C# in VS2003 was actually 1.2, believe it or not. Personally I like to stick to 1, 2, 3 :) -- Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message confused here.news:MPG.21aea1d7761bb2b7631@msnews.microsoft.com... > Dylan Parry <use***@dylanparry.com> wrote: >> > C# 3.0? >> >> Actually I meant C# 3 without the point-oh. Fingers going faster than >> the brain. > > Some people do put the ".0" in for various versions of C#. In theory > the version of C# in VS2003 was actually 1.2, believe it or not. > > Personally I like to stick to 1, 2, 3 :) > do we already use c# 3 (as language version) on the Orca? I see we do. I thought it's not out yet.
Show quote "AlieN" <makni_alen_remove@alenj_ukloni.net> wrote in message news:fi41ds$dlf$1@ss408.t-com.hr... > > "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.21aea1d7761bb2b7631@msnews.microsoft.com... >> Dylan Parry <use***@dylanparry.com> wrote: >>> > C# 3.0? >>> >>> Actually I meant C# 3 without the point-oh. Fingers going faster than >>> the brain. >> >> Some people do put the ".0" in for various versions of C#. In theory >> the version of C# in VS2003 was actually 1.2, believe it or not. >> >> Personally I like to stick to 1, 2, 3 :) >> > > confused here. > do we already use c# 3 (as language version) on the Orca? > AlieN <makni_alen_remove@alenj_ukloni.net> wrote:
> I see we do. I thought it's not out yet. It was released on Monday.-- Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics