"PvdG42" <p***@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
news:%23y$vTtTIIHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "David" <dfume***@ATTHISADDRESSgmailDOT.com> wrote in message
> news:96F99060-70F8-40B3-984C-B0C6FD323DF3@microsoft.com...
>> Hi,
>> If I install .net framework 3.5 beta 2 will that interfere with the
>> running
>> of the version 2 or version 3?
>> TIA, David
>>
>
> No, the frameworks install and operate as separate entities.

"Henning Krause [MVP - Exchange]" <newsgroups_rem***@this.infinitec.de>
wrote in message news:eARrVnUIIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> not quite true.
>
> .NET 3.5 adds a bunch of assemblies to the .NET Framework 2.0, just like
> the 3.0 version did.
>
> But it also requires .NET 2.0 SP1 and .NET 3.0 SP1, which it will install
> duing the installation. That will actually replace some of the .NET 2.0
> and .NET 3.0 bits on  your system. And since it's in beta for now (the RTM
> of .NET 3.5 will be released this month) I would wait.
>
> Kind regards,
> Henning Krause
>
>
>
> "PvdG42" <p***@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
> news:%23y$vTtTIIHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> "David" <dfume***@ATTHISADDRESSgmailDOT.com> wrote in message
>> news:96F99060-70F8-40B3-984C-B0C6FD323DF3@microsoft.com...
>>> Hi,
>>> If I install .net framework 3.5 beta 2 will that interfere with the
>>> running
>>> of the version 2 or version 3?
>>> TIA, David
>>>
>>
>> No, the frameworks install and operate as separate entities.
>