|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Testers & Reviewers Needed for Open Source .NET ProjectNValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. It's purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make it easier to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and correctly. The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on test products, the binaries should not be used against production code. The source materials and online documentation can be found at http://www.nvalidate.org. I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: - Defects - Performance - Design and architecture - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you looking for something more?) This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library written by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* have to say about it than anyone else. Thanks in advance. Mike Hofer NValidate Developer P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I suspect I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. Thanks. Mike wrote:
> This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library written Had I the time, I would definitely give it a whirl.> by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* have > to say about it than anyone else. > > Thanks in advance. > Mike Hofer > NValidate Developer > > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I > suspect I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. > Thanks. I'm chiming in mostly because I think it'd be silly for anyone to come down on you for spamming. This is entirely topical to the groups posted to, and it's not like you're selling anything or looking to hire anyone. You're developing software that people can examine/contribute to and that they may actually use. All three of those things contribute to the learning process. Chris. Mike,
I'd easily defend this post if you took heat for it. Granted, there is an announcements group, but I don't see the harm in something like this. I've actually been waiting for this since I saw your previous post regarding namespaces. -- Show quote- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] - mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com "Mike" <tyrantmi***@comcast.net> wrote in message news:yY6dneVC2d8GR4DanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... >I am looking for volunteers to help review the source code and design of >NValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. It's >purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make it easier >to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and correctly. > > The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on test > products, the binaries should not be used against production code. The > source materials and online documentation can be found at > http://www.nvalidate.org. > > I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: > > - Defects > - Performance > - Design and architecture > - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) > - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you > looking for something more?) > > This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library written > by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* have > to say about it than anyone else. > > Thanks in advance. > Mike Hofer > NValidate Developer > > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I suspect > I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. Thanks. On Oct 23, 10:42 am, "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]"
<m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote: Show quote > Mike, Thanks! Could you provide the name of that group, for me? I couldn't> > I'd easily defend this post if you took heat for it. Granted, there is > an announcements group, but I don't see the harm in something like this. > I've actually been waiting for this since I saw your previous post regarding > namespaces. > > -- > - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] > - m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com > > "Mike" <tyrantmi***@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:yY6dneVC2d8GR4DanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... > > > > >I am looking for volunteers to help review the source code and design of > >NValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. It's > >purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make it easier > >to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and correctly. > > > The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on test > > products, the binaries should not be used against production code. The > > source materials and online documentation can be found at > >http://www.nvalidate.org. > > > I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: > > > - Defects > > - Performance > > - Design and architecture > > - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) > > - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you > > looking for something more?) > > > This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library written > > by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code > > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* have > > to say about it than anyone else. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Mike Hofer > > NValidate Developer > > > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this > > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I suspect > > I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. Thanks.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - find it. Mike Mike,
Hmm, looking at the newsgroup list, I couldn't find an announcement group specific to .NET (there was an ASP.NET one, that's about it). So I guess this group is as good as any! -- Show quote- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] - mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com "Mike Hofer" <kchighl***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1193154498.990499.102590@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 23, 10:42 am, "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" > <m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote: >> Mike, >> >> I'd easily defend this post if you took heat for it. Granted, there >> is >> an announcements group, but I don't see the harm in something like this. >> I've actually been waiting for this since I saw your previous post >> regarding >> namespaces. >> >> -- >> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] >> - m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com >> >> "Mike" <tyrantmi***@comcast.net> wrote in message >> >> news:yY6dneVC2d8GR4DanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... >> >> >> >> >I am looking for volunteers to help review the source code and design of >> >NValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. >> >It's >> >purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make it >> >easier >> >to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and >> >correctly. >> >> > The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on >> > test >> > products, the binaries should not be used against production code. The >> > source materials and online documentation can be found at >> >http://www.nvalidate.org. >> >> > I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: >> >> > - Defects >> > - Performance >> > - Design and architecture >> > - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) >> > - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you >> > looking for something more?) >> >> > This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library >> > written >> > by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code >> > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* >> > have >> > to say about it than anyone else. >> >> > Thanks in advance. >> > Mike Hofer >> > NValidate Developer >> >> > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this >> > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I >> > suspect >> > I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. >> > Thanks.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Thanks! Could you provide the name of that group, for me? I couldn't > find it. > > Mike > On Oct 23, 12:19 pm, "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]"
<m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote: Show quote > Mike, Gah!!!!> > Hmm, looking at the newsgroup list, I couldn't find an announcement > group specific to .NET (there was an ASP.NET one, that's about it). So I > guess this group is as good as any! > > -- > - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] > - m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com > > "Mike Hofer" <kchighl***@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1193154498.990499.102590@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Oct 23, 10:42 am, "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" > > <m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote: > >> Mike, > > >> I'd easily defend this post if you took heat for it. Granted, there > >> is > >> an announcements group, but I don't see the harm in something like this. > >> I've actually been waiting for this since I saw your previous post > >> regarding > >> namespaces. > > >> -- > >> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] > >> - m...@spam.guard.caspershouse.com > > >> "Mike" <tyrantmi***@comcast.net> wrote in message > > >>news:yY6dneVC2d8GR4DanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com... > > >> >I am looking for volunteers to help review the source code and design of > >> >NValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. > >> >It's > >> >purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make it > >> >easier > >> >to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and > >> >correctly. > > >> > The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on > >> > test > >> > products, the binaries should not be used against production code. The > >> > source materials and online documentation can be found at > >> >http://www.nvalidate.org. > > >> > I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: > > >> > - Defects > >> > - Performance > >> > - Design and architecture > >> > - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) > >> > - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you > >> > looking for something more?) > > >> > This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library > >> > written > >> > by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code > >> > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* > >> > have > >> > to say about it than anyone else. > > >> > Thanks in advance. > >> > Mike Hofer > >> > NValidate Developer > > >> > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this > >> > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I > >> > suspect > >> > I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. > >> > Thanks.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Thanks! Could you provide the name of that group, for me? I couldn't > > find it. > > > Mike- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Curses! Foiled again! :-) Thanks anyway! Once I get this thing to an official 1.0 release, I'm thinking of writing an article on CodeProject. If that's not terribly Spammy, that is. Hi Mike
You have come at the right time. I will include your project into my 3 projects currently under development. So I am happy to give feedback in errors and documentation. Regards Jeff Mike wrote: Show quote > I am looking for volunteers to help review the source code and design of > NValidate, an open-source parameter validation library written in C#. > It's purpose is to streamline your parameter validation code, and make > it easier to write, so that you're more likely to do it consistently and > correctly. > > The project is currently in an alpha release; while it can be used on > test products, the binaries should not be used against production code. > The source materials and online documentation can be found at > http://www.nvalidate.org. > > I'm looking for feedback on the following aspects: > > - Defects > - Performance > - Design and architecture > - Extensibility (how easily you can add your own tests to it) > - Documentation (is the current documentation sufficient, or are you > looking for something more?) > > This is my first open source project. Further, this is a library written > by a developer *for* developers, and its purpose is to improve code > quality. Consequently, I'm far more interested in what *DEVELOPERS* have > to say about it than anyone else. > > Thanks in advance. > Mike Hofer > NValidate Developer > > P.S. If someone could recommend a more appropriate place to place this > type of a post, I'd appreciate it. I feel like I'm spamming, and I > suspect I'll take some heat for it, I just didn't know where else to go. > Thanks.  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics