|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
VISTA and installing .NET 1.1It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: Source: MsiInstaller Event ID: 1030 Description: Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1. The application tried to install a more recent version of the protected Windows file C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\sbs_wminet_utils.dll. You may need to update your operating system for this application to work correctly. (Package Version: 1.0.0.0, Operating System Protected Version: 1.0.0.0). Source: MsiInstaller Event ID: 1030 Description: Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1. The application tried to install a more recent version of the protected Windows file C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\sbs_system.enterpriseservices.dll. You may need to update your operating system for this application to work correctly. (Package Version: 1.0.0.0, Operating System Protected Version: 1.0.0.0). etc etc why? > I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 <snip/>> > It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: > why? You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already has the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. -- Rory what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?!
Show quote "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... >> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 >> >> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: > > <snip/> > >> why? > > You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already has > the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. > > -- > Rory > > > what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! VS2002 and VS2003 are completely unsupported on Vista.> VS2005 is sorta supported in that SP1 was largely designed to help with this but can only help you write 2.0 applications out of the box. VS2007(Orcas - Not yet released) is designed specifically for Vista and will be able to specifically target 20,3.0 and 3.5 out of the box) However, given enough memory, I've heard that running XP on a virtual machine within vista works quite well. I understand that this is the best (and possibly only) way to run previous versions of VS on Vista -- Rory That's only sort of true. Visual Studio 2002/2003 are unsupported on
Vista, but you should still be able to run applications developed with them on a Vista machine. Robin S. -------------------------- Show quote "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:b0ac48a0c49f8c95f756236e610@msnews.microsoft.com... >> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >> > > VS2002 and VS2003 are completely unsupported on Vista. > VS2005 is sorta supported in that SP1 was largely designed to help with > this but can only help you write 2.0 applications out of the box. > VS2007(Orcas - Not yet released) is designed specifically for Vista and > will be able to specifically target 20,3.0 and 3.5 out of the box) > > However, given enough memory, I've heard that running XP on a virtual > machine within vista works quite well. I understand that this is the best > (and possibly only) way to run previous versions of VS on Vista > > -- > Rory > > but i need vs2003 as i want to develop 1.1 app
Show quote "RobinS" <RobinS@NoSpam.yah.none> wrote in message news:osKdnS-P9dWz_NzbnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@comcast.com... > That's only sort of true. Visual Studio 2002/2003 are unsupported on > Vista, but you should still be able to run applications developed with > them on a Vista machine. > > Robin S. > -------------------------- > "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message > news:b0ac48a0c49f8c95f756236e610@msnews.microsoft.com... >>> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >>> >> >> VS2002 and VS2003 are completely unsupported on Vista. >> VS2005 is sorta supported in that SP1 was largely designed to help with >> this but can only help you write 2.0 applications out of the box. >> VS2007(Orcas - Not yet released) is designed specifically for Vista and >> will be able to specifically target 20,3.0 and 3.5 out of the box) >> >> However, given enough memory, I've heard that running XP on a virtual >> machine within vista works quite well. I understand that this is the best >> (and possibly only) way to run previous versions of VS on Vista >> >> -- >> Rory >> >> > > will Orcas run on XP?
Show quote "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:b0ac48a0c49f8c95f756236e610@msnews.microsoft.com... >> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >> > > VS2002 and VS2003 are completely unsupported on Vista. > VS2005 is sorta supported in that SP1 was largely designed to help with > this but can only help you write 2.0 applications out of the box. > VS2007(Orcas - Not yet released) is designed specifically for Vista and > will be able to specifically target 20,3.0 and 3.5 out of the box) > > However, given enough memory, I've heard that running XP on a virtual > machine within vista works quite well. I understand that this is the best > (and possibly only) way to run previous versions of VS on Vista > > -- > Rory > > > will Orcas run on XP? I have no concrete evidence but I would say yes.> I have previously run it in a virtual machine which was based on Server 2003 so I would think it does. -- Rory
Show quote
On May 8, 10:02 am, "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> Don't use vista, it sucks.wrote: > what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! > > "Rory Becker" <RoryBec...@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message > > news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... > > >> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 > > >> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: > > > <snip/> > > >> why? > > > You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already has > > the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. > > > -- > > Rory it's the most intelligent thing to do... that's what i 'm doing
<oscar.acostamonte***@googlemail.com> wrote in message Show quote news:1178617691.681912.154270@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > On May 8, 10:02 am, "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> > wrote: >> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >> >> "Rory Becker" <RoryBec...@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message >> >> news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >> >> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 >> >> >> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: >> >> > <snip/> >> >> >> why? >> >> > You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already >> > has >> > the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. >> >> > -- >> > Rory > > Don't use vista, it sucks. > >> Don't use vista, it sucks. Well I'd have to counter that.>> > it's the most intelligent thing to do... that's what i 'm doing Some consider Vista a pain Others consider it to require too much in the way of hardware to be worth anything. Some like it. All are entitled to their opinion But the truth is that it isn't going to go anywhere and to stick your head in the sand and ignore it is not going to be a clever move for a developer of any kind who works in the MS spaces. I'm not trying to sugegst that Evan is about to do this and I appriciate the need to continue programming in dotnet 1.1 as several companies (Mine included ) have yet to actually make the jump to dotnet 2.0 or 3.0 (although we are scheduled do that this month). What I am going to do (as soon as funding permits) is to purchase the best mahine available and run Vista. On this machine I will ....run VS2005 + SP1 ....run Orcas when it comes out ....run VS2003 in an XP VM for as long as I need to. (I have seen others manage to do this very well indeed with no real loss of productivity) .... and most importantly of all ...become familiar with the Vista environment which as I said... isn't going to go anywhere. I welcome any sensible comment on this but I do believe that it's the best way forward ( assuming that those wishing to follow said plan can afford to purchase a reasonable enough machine) -- Rory The problem is that we have apps in 1.1, 2.0. Some clients will not pay the
costs to move from 1.1 to 2.0 since for them they don't care! In any case i will install XP as my normal PC and then try to use an alternate PC to test VISTA till all works. I agree that VISTA is the way forward... but it's still in the first stages, lots of missing drivers, etc! Evan Show quote "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:b0ac48a0c80d8c960663aa7c910@msnews.microsoft.com... >>> Don't use vista, it sucks. >>> >> it's the most intelligent thing to do... that's what i 'm doing > > Well I'd have to counter that. > > Some consider Vista a pain Others consider it to require too much in the > way of hardware to be worth anything. > Some like it. > > All are entitled to their opinion > > But the truth is that it isn't going to go anywhere and to stick your head > in the sand and ignore it is not going to be a clever move for a developer > of any kind who works in the MS spaces. > > I'm not trying to sugegst that Evan is about to do this and I appriciate > the need to continue programming in dotnet 1.1 as several companies (Mine > included ) have yet to actually make the jump to dotnet 2.0 or 3.0 > (although we are scheduled do that this month). > What I am going to do (as soon as funding permits) is to purchase the best > mahine available and run Vista. > > On this machine I will ...run VS2005 + SP1 ...run Orcas when it comes out > ...run VS2003 in an XP VM for as long as I need to. (I have seen others > manage to do this very well indeed with no real loss of productivity) > > ... and most importantly of all ...become familiar with the Vista > environment which as I said... isn't going to go anywhere. > > I welcome any sensible comment on this but I do believe that it's the best > way forward ( assuming that those wishing to follow said plan can afford > to purchase a reasonable enough machine) > > -- > Rory > > > 1.1 application run fin on the latest frameworks...
they are backward compatible... Show quote "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> wrote in message news:O9lmCdUkHHA.744@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! > > > "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message > news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... >>> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 >>> >>> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: >> >> <snip/> >> >>> why? >> >> You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already >> has the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. >> >> -- >> Rory >> >> > i dont' want to run 1.1 apps... i want to develop 1.1 apps!
Show quote "Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld> wrote in message news:%23ceGWEdkHHA.4872@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > 1.1 application run fin on the latest frameworks... > they are backward compatible... > > -- > Regards, > Lloyd Dupont > NovaMind Software > Mind Mapping at its best > www.nova-mind.com > "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> wrote in message > news:O9lmCdUkHHA.744@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >> >> >> "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message >> news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... >>>> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 >>>> >>>> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: >>> >>> <snip/> >>> >>>> why? >>> >>> You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already >>> has the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. >>> >>> -- >>> Rory >>> >>> >> > Make an XP VM image and develop on that.
Show quote "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> wrote in message news:%23TuEf9jkHHA.680@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >i dont' want to run 1.1 apps... i want to develop 1.1 apps! > > > "Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld> wrote in message > news:%23ceGWEdkHHA.4872@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> 1.1 application run fin on the latest frameworks... >> they are backward compatible... >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Lloyd Dupont >> NovaMind Software >> Mind Mapping at its best >> www.nova-mind.com >> "Evan Camilleri" <e***@holisticrd.com.nospam> wrote in message >> news:O9lmCdUkHHA.744@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> what if i want to continue developing a 1.1 application?! >>> >>> >>> "Rory Becker" <RoryBecker@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message >>> news:b0ac48a0c3c38c95eed187fb2b0@msnews.microsoft.com... >>>>> I have .NET 2.0 on a VISTA machine and am trying to install .NET 1.1 >>>>> >>>>> It is failing with the following error in Events Viewer: >>>> >>>> <snip/> >>>> >>>>> why? >>>> >>>> You shouldn't need to install the 1.1 framework on Vista as it already >>>> has the 3.0(2.0 + extras) framework on it. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>> >> >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics