"Michael Nemtsev" <nemt***@msn.com> wrote in message
news:a279a63a3e91778c940db9b729f8b@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello tcw,
>
> Yep.
> read there
> http://dotnetdebug.blogspot.com/2006/01/running-net-20-and-11-side-by-side.html
>
> ---
> WBR,  Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP].  My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
> Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/
>
> "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
> miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
>
> t> Is it safe to use a third party's C# library which was built with
> t> .NET 1.1 in my .NET 2.0 projecct? Thank you in advance.
> t> t> -tcw
> t>
>

"tcw" <tcwa***@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ut0G83jcHHA.3632@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Is it safe to use a third party's C# library which was built with .NET 1.1
> in my .NET 2.0 projecct? Thank you in advance.
>
> -tcw
>

"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote in
message news:730C0BA3-4B4A-4395-8859-C6A2CAC36C5B@microsoft.com...
> .NET 2.0 is backwards compatible with 1.1, so you should be able to stick
> any 1.1 assembly into your project and run it without problems. I say
> "should" as there is always a potential that somethign will not work. If
> you have the option of a 2.0 assembly, I would choose that first. If not,
> be a bit paranoid and test, test, test. This is good advice, no matter
> what you are building.
> --
> Gregory A. Beamer
> MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
> http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com
>
> *********************************************
> Think outside the box!
> *********************************************
> "tcw" <tcwa***@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:ut0G83jcHHA.3632@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Is it safe to use a third party's C# library which was built with .NET
>> 1.1 in my .NET 2.0 projecct? Thank you in advance.
>>
>> -tcw
>>
>