VS2005

I have Class library that serve as COM. I put some setting to the
My.Setting, the compile create file with name: xxxx.dll.config

Now I read that config not work with DLL, I try that, and it's seem
that true, this is not working. this is true? and why the compiler
create this file on bin\debug folder?

Hello mtczx***@yahoo.com,

try this

ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExe­cutingAssembly().Location)


---
WBR,  Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP]. 
My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

dear MVP Michael Nemtsev
the work with such tools (.NET) become hard and hard. we are westing
all our time to look after answer.
take this simple example. you send us the mathod:

ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExe­­
cutingAssembly().Location)

I try it, but the "config.AppSettings.Settings.Count" is 0, no setting
loaded!

why not have Clear answer for this porpose of Setting for DLL!

the microsoft tell us that Open source is westing time, this is true,
but Microsoft tools suffer from the same problem.

Framework with no doc is not worth.

So have any body with true solution?

and more question. suppose we success to read the Setting, what about
my.setting in DLL?, even we success to read the setting, it's not
populate the natural my.setting object that VS create automatic code
for?




On 27 Mar, 10:46, Michael Nemtsev <nemt***@msn.com> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote

gc.KeepAlive - is this the reality of garbage collection
My .NET service dows not stop in a controlled way
Any such thing as a single column HashTable?
Convert.ToInt32("0") throws an exception, some systems
Another Thread Safety Question