|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AOP FrameworkHello,
I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could be made on the Microsoft's platform. Thank you. Xavier Collet wrote:
> Hello, In the .NET world, most AOP initiatives are pretty low-level or> > I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in > the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? > I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and > AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could > be made on the Microsoft's platform. abandoned because of lack of interest. One of the most mature ones, as it has proper documentation, is postsharp. Postsharp is a compiletime/runtime weaver with a solid architecture. http://www.postsharp.org/ FB -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 5 mar, 09:41, "Frans Bouma [C# MVP]"
<perseus.usenetNOS***@xs4all.nl> wrote: Show quote > Xavier Collet wrote: I didn't try that one. It'll be done as soon as possible. ;-)> > Hello, > > > I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in > > the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? > > I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and > > AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could > > be made on the Microsoft's platform. > > In the .NET world, most AOP initiatives are pretty low-level or > abandoned because of lack of interest. One of the most mature ones, as > it has proper documentation, is postsharp. Postsharp is a > compiletime/runtime weaver with a solid architecture.http://www.postsharp.org/ > > FB > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET > LLBLGen Pro website:http://www.llblgen.com > My .NET blog:http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma > Microsoft MVP (C#) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you ! Thus wrote Xavier,
> Hello, There's Spring.NET -- haven't used it, though.> > I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in > the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? > I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and > AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could > be made on the Microsoft's platform. Cheers, -- Joerg Jooss news-re***@joergjooss.de On 5 mar, 23:34, Joerg Jooss <news-re***@joergjooss.de> wrote:
Show quote > Thus wrote Xavier, I liked a lot using Spring on the Java Platform, and I firstly thought> > > Hello, > > > I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in > > the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? > > I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and > > AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could > > be made on the Microsoft's platform. > > There's Spring.NET -- haven't used it, though. > > Cheers, > -- > Joerg Jooss > news-re***@joergjooss.de to use it. But I was wondering if it was mature enough to be a good choice... Even if I used a lot Spring AOP, I prefer now AspectJ Annotations. Is there any framework that provide such feature ? I saw that Spring provides attributes for adviced methods, but that doesn't seem to be the same feature as with AspectJ. Moreover, I liked that Spring.Net was Compact Framework compliant in its 1.0 release, but the compatibility seems to be broken since.. That's why I've looked elsewhere. Postsharp seems to be quite interesting (I havent tried it yet - i'm still not sure about the CF compatibility), but still in beta... What do you think about AspectDNG ? Thank you. On 5 mar, 23:34, Joerg Jooss <news-re***@joergjooss.de> wrote:
Show quote > Thus wrote Xavier, I liked a lot using Spring on the Java Platform, and I firstly thought> > > Hello, > > > I would like to know which implementation is the more mature in > > the .NET world. Is there limitation on the compact framework ? > > I already used some Java AOP framework in the past (Spring and > > AspectJ), but I would like to have an idea about the choice that could > > be made on the Microsoft's platform. > > There's Spring.NET -- haven't used it, though. > > Cheers, > -- > Joerg Jooss > news-re***@joergjooss.de to use it. But I was wondering if it was mature enough to be a good choice... Even if I used a lot Spring AOP, I prefer now AspectJ Annotations. Is there any framework that provide such feature ? I saw that Spring provides attributes for adviced methods, but that doesn't seem to be the same feature as with AspectJ. Moreover, I liked that Spring.Net was Compact Framework compliant in its 1.0 release, but the compatibility seems to be broken since.. That's why I've looked elsewhere. Postsharp seems to be quite interesting (I havent tried it yet - i'm still not sure about the CF compatibility), but still in beta... What do you think about AspectDNG ? Thank you. Thus wrote Xavier,
> I liked a lot using Spring on the Java Platform, and I firstly thought As I've said, as much as I liked Spring for Java, I've never used the .NET > to use it. But I was wondering if it was mature enough to be a good > choice... version so far, but will do at some point in time ;-) > Even if I used a lot Spring AOP, I prefer now AspectJ Annotations. Is Same here. I've yet to touch an AOP framework for .NET. > there any framework that provide such feature ? I saw that Spring > provides attributes for adviced methods, but that doesn't seem to be > the same feature as with AspectJ. > Moreover, I liked that Spring.Net was Compact Framework compliant in > its 1.0 release, but the compatibility seems to be broken since.. > That's why I've looked elsewhere. Postsharp seems to be quite > interesting (I havent tried it yet - i'm still not sure about the CF > compatibility), but still in beta... What do you think about AspectDNG > ? Cheers, -- Joerg Jooss news-re***@joergjooss.de  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics