|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
need obfuscationIs this Community Edition Obfuscator any good? Is there a good one or a
good method that doesn't cost so much money? Thanks, T Tina wrote:
> Is this Community Edition Obfuscator any good? Is there a good one It's very good, though you have to help it. > or a good method that doesn't cost so much money? Thanks, > T One of the key things you have to do is to make as much classes and methods PRIVATE or INTERNAL. This is essential. For example a .exe project should have just all its classes internal and all methods internal. This will give the obfuscator much more freedom to rename the classes and methods. FB -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:43:04 -0800, Tina wrote:
> Is this Community Edition Obfuscator any good? Is there a good one or a It's pretty good, but then again it depends on how much obfuscation you> good method that doesn't cost so much money? > Thanks, > T want. For instance it doesn't encrypt strings. But all in all, pretty much bang for the buck (As a humerous aside:) You could try using non normalized unicode strings as
in this approach: http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/02/07/368570.aspx It sure made my head hurt just to look at! It's just... so wrong at every level. -- Show quoteChris Mullins, MCSD.NET, MCPD:Enterprise, Microsoft C# MVP http://www.coversant.com/blogs/cmullins "Rad [Visual C# MVP]" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:y4qcg7megdhj.dlg@thinkersroom.com... > On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:43:04 -0800, Tina wrote: > >> Is this Community Edition Obfuscator any good? Is there a good one or a >> good method that doesn't cost so much money? >> Thanks, >> T > > It's pretty good, but then again it depends on how much obfuscation you > want. For instance it doesn't encrypt strings. But all in all, pretty much > bang for the buck > -- > Bits.Bytes > http://bytes.thinkersroom.com On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:36:29 -0800, Chris Mullins [MVP] wrote:
> (As a humerous aside:) You could try using non normalized unicode strings as Oh my goodness!! That's verging on the illegal!!!> in this approach: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/02/07/368570.aspx > > It sure made my head hurt just to look at! It's just... so wrong at every > level. That looks cool! I stared at it for at least a second before I realized all
the a's were different. Robin S. ------------------------ Show quote "Chris Mullins [MVP]" <cmull***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Obxli$DYHHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > (As a humerous aside:) You could try using non normalized unicode strings > as in this approach: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/02/07/368570.aspx > > It sure made my head hurt just to look at! It's just... so wrong at every > level. > > -- > Chris Mullins, MCSD.NET, MCPD:Enterprise, Microsoft C# MVP > http://www.coversant.com/blogs/cmullins > > "Rad [Visual C# MVP]" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:y4qcg7megdhj.dlg@thinkersroom.com... >> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:43:04 -0800, Tina wrote: >> >>> Is this Community Edition Obfuscator any good? Is there a good one or >>> a >>> good method that doesn't cost so much money? >>> Thanks, >>> T >> >> It's pretty good, but then again it depends on how much obfuscation you >> want. For instance it doesn't encrypt strings. But all in all, pretty >> much >> bang for the buck >> -- >> Bits.Bytes >> http://bytes.thinkersroom.com > >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics