>> - my approach:
>>       public void AcceptChanges()
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>         }
>> - Visusal Studio error: 'T' does not contain a definition for 'ObjectState'
>
>What is your definition for "T"?  I am assuming this article is using
>it as a generic object, meaning you need to create it and what it is
>supposed to be; in this case, give it a property of "ObjectState".
>Read the article to figure out what the expectations of the object are
>(namely, what it is supposed to be based on).
>
>> - my approach:
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Syntax error, '(' expected
>
>This is an issue of scope.  The proper syntax is:
>
>using (txScope)
>{
>   ....
>}
>
>--
>lucas

>> Public MustInherit Class BaseList(Of T As BaseObject) Inherits BindingList(Of
>> T)
>
>public abstract class BaseList<T> : BindingList<T>
>  where T : BaseObject
>
>-- Barry
>

>> - Visusal Studio error: 'T' does not contain a definition for 'ObjectState'
>
>C# is case sensetive while VB is not. Have you checked the exact name,
>so it isn't for example "objectState"?
>
>> - my approach:
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Syntax error, '(' expected
>
>using (txScope) {
>    ...
>}
>

> Hi Goran,
>
> Thanks.  The using syntax works, but I still have problem converting the
> definition
> for the generic T.  I
>
> public abstract class BaseList<T of BaseObject> : BindingList<T>
>
> -  I want the generic key argument inherits properties defined in BaseObject.
>
> Originaal VB.NET syntax is:
>
> Public MustInherit Class BaseList(Of T As BaseObject) Inherits BindingList(Of
> T)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alan L.
>
>
> Göran Andersson wrote:
>>> - Visusal Studio error: 'T' does not contain a definition for 'ObjectState'
>> C# is case sensetive while VB is not. Have you checked the exact name,
>> so it isn't for example "objectState"?
>>
>>> - my approach:
>>>
>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> Syntax error, '(' expected
>> using (txScope) {
>>    ...
>> }
>>
>

>If you have a base class for all objects that the class handles, then
>you don't need to use generics at all in your class. Just use the base
>class when you inherit the BindingList.
>
>public abstract class BaseList : BindingList<BaseObject>
>
>Now your BaseList is a BindingList that handles any object that inherits
>from BaseObject.
>
>In your method that loops the items, just reference them as BaseObject:
>
>public void AcceptChanges() {
>    foreach (BaseObject item in this.Items) {
>       item.ObjectState = ObjectState.Unchanged;
>    }
>    DeletedRows.Clear();
>}
>
>> Hi Goran,
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>>    ...
>>> }
>

On Feb 17, 7:52 pm, "alee via DotNetMonster.com" <u31808@uwe> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to convert a program from Microsoft VB.NET team:
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/vbteam/archive/2005/04/14/TableAdaptersAndObjec...
>
> I am having a hard time converting the following two sections.  Anyone knows
> the C# equivalent?
>
> - oringial VB.NET code from VB Team:
> Public Sub AcceptChanges()
>
>     For Each item As T In Me.Items
>
>         item.ObjectState = ObjectState.Unchanged
>
>     Next
>
>     DeletedRows.Clear()
>
> End Sub
>
> - my approach:
>       public void AcceptChanges()
>         {
>             foreach (T item in this.Items)
>             {
>                 item.ObjectState = ObjectState.Unchanged;
>             }
>             DeletedRows.Clear();
>         }
> - Visusal Studio error: 'T' does not contain a definition for 'ObjectState'
>
> 2.  Original code from VB team:
>
> Dim txScope As New System.Transactions.TransactionScope
>
>     Using txScope
>     ...
>     end using
>
> - my approach:
>
>     using txScope
>     {
>         ...
>     }
> - Visual Studio:
>
> Syntax error, '(' expected
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alan L.
>
> --
> Message posted viahttp://www.dotnetmonster.com

>> Hello,
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>> --
>> Message posted viahttp://www.dotnetmonster.com
>
>Hi,
>
>The first equivalent:
>Well, you are trying to use a class (T) that is supposed to have an
>ObjectState property. However, this should be explicitly declared
>using the "where" keyword in C#. You need to change the class
>definition to something as follows:
>
>public class MyClass<T> where T: BizObjBase
>
>this tells the compiler that T is of type BizObjBase...
>
>The second equivalent:
>using (TransactionScope txScope = new TransactionScope())
>{
>  //do whatever you need with txScope
>}
>
>HTH,
>Mehdi

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to convert a program from Microsoft VB.NET team:
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/vbteam/archive/2005/04/14/TableAdaptersAndObjects.aspx
>
> I am having a hard time converting the following two sections.  Anyone
> knows
> the C# equivalent?
>
>
> - oringial VB.NET code from VB Team:
> Public Sub AcceptChanges()
>
>    For Each item As T In Me.Items
>
>        item.ObjectState = ObjectState.Unchanged
>
>    Next
>
>    DeletedRows.Clear()
>
> End Sub
>
> - my approach:
>      public void AcceptChanges()
>        {
>            foreach (T item in this.Items)
>            {
>                item.ObjectState = ObjectState.Unchanged;
>            }
>            DeletedRows.Clear();
>        }
> - Visusal Studio error: 'T' does not contain a definition for
> 'ObjectState'
>
> 2.  Original code from VB team:
>
> Dim txScope As New System.Transactions.TransactionScope
>
>    Using txScope
>    ...
>    end using
>
> - my approach:
>
>    using txScope
>    {
>        ...
>    }
> - Visual Studio:
>
> Syntax error, '(' expected
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alan L.
>
> --
> Message posted via http://www.dotnetmonster.com
>

>Google instant C#, this application will translate your VB code into C#. It
>is very good.
>
>> Hello,
>>
>[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>>
>> Alan L.