|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Framework 3.0 documentation?Is Net 3.0 framework documentation a part of SDK?
I would like to have this locally http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734631.aspx I have WF extensions to VS.NET running, but no local documentation... Hello Stan,
SB> Is Net 3.0 framework documentation a part of SDK? Yes, you need to download Windows SDK --- WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP]. Blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/ "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo Here's the link to the Windows SDK. It says it's for Vista, but it also
works on XP (SP-2). http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7614fe22-8a64-4dfb-aa0c-db53035f40a0&DisplayLang=en To tie the help in to Visual Studio, you needed to download and install the Windows SDK *before* installing the .Net 3.0 extentions. So you might want to reinstall the .Net 3.0 extentions afterwards, or deinstall them, install the Windows SDK, then reinstall them, so when you hit F1 in Visual Studio, it will find the .Net 3.0 help. Here's the link for those in case you need it. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=F54F5537-CC86-4BF5-AE44-F5A1E805680D&displaylang=en Robin S. Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto. ----------------------------------------------- Show quote "Michael Nemtsev" <nemt***@msn.com> wrote in message news:a279a63a3dc7028c918ed50726e28@msnews.microsoft.com... > Hello Stan, > > SB> Is Net 3.0 framework documentation a part of SDK? > > Yes, you need to download Windows SDK > > --- > WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP]. Blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour > team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/ > > "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and > we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo > > > To tie the help in to Visual Studio, you needed to download and install Oh, that maybe why I couldn't get it to work..> the Windows SDK *before* installing the .Net 3.0 extentions. So you might > want to reinstall the .Net 3.0 extentions afterwards, or deinstall them, > install the Windows SDK, then reinstall them, so when you hit F1 in Visual > Studio, it will find the .Net 3.0 help. Here's the link for those in case > you need it. > Thanks! On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:39:11 -0800, RobinS <RobinS@NoSpam.yah.none> wrot=
e: > Here's the link to the Windows SDK. It says it's for Vista, but it als= 64-4dfb-aa0c-db53035f40a0&DisplayLang=3Deno > works on XP (SP-2). > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3D7614fe22-8a= > Thank you very much for the links, and especially the explanation about => > To tie the help in to Visual Studio, you needed to download and instal= l = > the Windows SDK *before* installing the .Net 3.0 extentions. = what order to install things. One thing I'm not clear on: can the SDK and extensions be installed with= = Visual Studio already installed? The installation page for the SDK has = a = blurb about uninstalling pre-release versions of a variety of software, = = including Visual Studio. But I'm hoping that really does mean just = pre-release versions, and that I don't have to uninstall VS 2005 before = = installing the SDK and extensions. Is that true? Thanks, Pete Thus wrote Peter,
Show quote > On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:39:11 -0800, RobinS <RobinS@NoSpam.yah.none> Yes. That's actually the preferred installation order.> wrote: > >> Here's the link to the Windows SDK. It says it's for Vista, but it >> also works on XP (SP-2). >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7614fe22-8a6 >> 4-4dfb-aa0c-db53035f40a0&DisplayLang=en >> >> To tie the help in to Visual Studio, you needed to download and >> install the Windows SDK *before* installing the .Net 3.0 extentions. >> > Thank you very much for the links, and especially the explanation > about what order to install things. > > One thing I'm not clear on: can the SDK and extensions be installed > with Visual Studio already installed? Cheers, -- Joerg Jooss news-re***@joergjooss.de > Yes. That's actually the preferred installation order. Great...thanks!"Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPe***@nnowslpianmk.com> wrote in message On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:39:11 -0800, RobinS <RobinS@NoSpam.yah.none> wrote:news:op.tnfxgjq98jd0ej@petes-computer.local... > Here's the link to the Windows SDK. It says it's for Vista, but it also Thank you very much for the links, and especially the explanation about> works on XP (SP-2). > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7614fe22-8a64-4dfb-aa0c-db53035f40a0&DisplayLang=en > > > To tie the help in to Visual Studio, you needed to download and install > the Windows SDK *before* installing the .Net 3.0 extentions. what order to install things. One thing I'm not clear on: can the SDK and extensions be installed with Visual Studio already installed? The installation page for the SDK has a blurb about uninstalling pre-release versions of a variety of software, including Visual Studio. But I'm hoping that really does mean just pre-release versions, and that I don't have to uninstall VS 2005 before installing the SDK and extensions. Is that true? Thanks, Pete ----------------------------------------- Yes, they can. In fact, I would be sure you have SP-1 installed for Visual Studio -- the real SP-1, not the beta. I think they're mostly talking about the betas for .Net 3.0. You want to be sure to uninstall any of those before you install the final version. Good luck. I've been playing around with WPF; it's pretty cool. Robin S. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||