Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About
Author
14 Nov 2006 11:35 AM
vaibhav parashar
Dear all

Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
or

is it just a Framework

whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework

EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
http://www.eggheadcafe.com

Author
14 Nov 2006 12:27 PM
vikasgoyal77@gmail.com
Its a technology platform which includes framework, application servers
, development environment etc.

http://dotnetwithme.blogspot.com
Vikas

On Nov 14, 4:35 pm, vaibhav parashar wrote:
Show quote
> Dear all
>
> Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
> or
>
> is it just a Framework
>
> whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework
>
> EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choicehttp://www.eggheadcafe.com
Author
14 Nov 2006 12:28 PM
Kevin Spencer
The Microsoft .Net platform is a platform, which is the same thing as a
framework. It is an existing structure that you build on, in this case, a
software structure on which you build software. A framework is a skeletal
structure designed to enclose something, or as the basis for something
bulit. So, in essences, they are the same idea. In carpentry, for example,
you build a foundation which serves as a platform upon which you build a
house or building. The first part of the house that is built is the frame, a
structure which is skinned and finished, which forms the overall shape of
the house.

A technology, on the other hand, is a set of scientific principles and/or
systems, which are used in the construction of technical constructs, such as
software programs. The .Net platform is not a technology per se, but
contains a number of technologies, which are like the tools and techniques
used to build with.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Ministry of Software Development
http://unclechutney.blogspot.com

Any experience you can walk away from
is a good one.



<vaibhav parashar> wrote in message
Show quote
news:2006111463524vaibhavkparashar@gmail.com...
> Dear all
>
> Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
> or
>
> is it just a Framework
>
> whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework
>
> EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
> http://www.eggheadcafe.com
Author
14 Nov 2006 3:14 PM
Brian Tkatch
vaibhav wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
> or
>
> is it just a Framework
>
> whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework
>
> EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
> http://www.eggheadcafe.com

..NET is a set of object-oriented inherited components with a strict
hierarchical interface.

"technology" and "Technolgical Platform" are just meaningless
buzzwords. Framework refers to a set of rules which allow things to be
done in a certain way, which .NET most certainly provides.

Because .NET is so different than the erstwhile standards, it also
strongly suggests a different way to go about doing the same things.

B.
Author
14 Nov 2006 3:58 PM
Dale
While .Net is "all the above" referring to all the previous replies, I had a
hard time moving to .Net in the early days until I finally began to see it as
simply a class library.

I struggled with the transition because I knew that .Net was supposed to be
this entirely new paradigm for developing software - and it is - but in its
simplest form, just think of it as a class library, or set of class
libraries, and Visual Studio .Net as a new IDE.  Learning all the rest about
the CLR, IL, etc. Once I started with that little step, it allowed the rest
of it to begin to make sense to me.


Dale
--
Dale Preston
MCAD C#
MCSE, MCDBA


Show quote
"vaibhav parashar" wrote:

> Dear all
>
> Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
> or
>
> is it just a Framework
>
> whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework
>
> EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
> http://www.eggheadcafe.com
>
Author
14 Nov 2006 4:04 PM
Dale
MyOriginalPost.Replace(
     "Learning all the rest about the CLR, IL, etc.",
     "Learning all the rest about the CLR, IL, ect. can come later."
);

--
Dale Preston
MCAD C#
MCSE, MCDBA


Show quote
"Dale" wrote:

> While .Net is "all the above" referring to all the previous replies, I had a
> hard time moving to .Net in the early days until I finally began to see it as
> simply a class library.
>
> I struggled with the transition because I knew that .Net was supposed to be
> this entirely new paradigm for developing software - and it is - but in its
> simplest form, just think of it as a class library, or set of class
> libraries, and Visual Studio .Net as a new IDE.  Learning all the rest about
> the CLR, IL, etc. Once I started with that little step, it allowed the rest
> of it to begin to make sense to me.
>
>
> Dale
> --
> Dale Preston
> MCAD C#
> MCSE, MCDBA
>
>
> "vaibhav parashar" wrote:
>
> > Dear all
> >
> > Is .NET a Technolgical Platform
> > or
> >
> > is it just a Framework
> >
> > whats different b/w techonolgy and Framework
> >
> > EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
> > http://www.eggheadcafe.com
> >
Author
14 Nov 2006 5:19 PM
ssamuel
Dale wrote:
> While .Net is "all the above" referring to all the previous replies, I had a
> hard time moving to .Net in the early days until I finally began to see it as
> simply a class library.

I think that's a little too much simplification. While maybe strictly
true, Microsoft intends .NET to be used with IIS, AD, WMI and their
other related technologies to offer a competitive solution to J2EE.

Between Windows server technologies the framework, and all the .NET
programming models (web services, Windows services, web forms and
Windows forms), you're encapsulating similar functionality to servlets,
Javabeans/EJB, JSP, JDBC, Tomcat, JNDI, and more. Clearly, J2EE is more
than a class library, and therefore .NET running with the linked
services is more than a class library.

Would .NET be "simply a class library" if mscorlib.dll was separated
into System and everything else in System.*? I would think not, and the
mere inclusion of lots of libraries in a single assembly, invoking the
assembly vs. namespace argument, doesn't make them the same. Other than
that, the rest of the class library can be freely retrofitted, yet .NET
as a platform would still stand.


Stephan
Author
15 Nov 2006 8:39 AM
Morten Wennevik
Well, Microsoft claim it is their strategy for a web service driven system.

http://www.microsoft.com/net/basics.mspx

What many people think of as .Net is actually the Framework for creating 
this system, although the system may not actually use any web services.  
Somehow the newsgroups microsoft.public.dotnet.general and 
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework seems almost identical.

--
Happy Coding!
Morten Wennevik [C# MVP]

AddThis Social Bookmark Button