Hello,
(Sorry for my English...)
I am using .NET 2.0 (I'm rather beginner) with Visual Web Developer 2005
Express Edition, Visual C# 2005 Express Edition and Visual Basic 2005
Express Edition.
I have downloaded 3.0 Framework (dotnetfx3setup.exe). Shall I use 2005
Express Edition or should I download new (2006?) versions?
Please help. Thanks in advance.
/RAM/

Hello R.A.M.,

Your VS versions are enough to work with .NET 3.0 as well as with WPF,WCF, WF

The next version of VS "Orcas" is still under developing, and only CTP version
is available

R> Hello,
R> (Sorry for my English...)
R> I am using .NET 2.0 (I'm rather beginner) with Visual Web Developer
R> 2005
R> Express Edition, Visual C# 2005 Express Edition and Visual Basic 2005
R> Express Edition.
R> I have downloaded 3.0 Framework (dotnetfx3setup.exe). Shall I use
R> 2005
R> Express Edition or should I download new (2006?) versions?
R> Please help. Thanks in advance.
R> /RAM/
---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

Hello Michael ,

uups, a little mistake
Windows Workflow isn't supported in VS Express

MN> Hello R.A.M.,
MN>
MN> Your VS versions are enough to work with .NET 3.0 as well as with
MN> WPF,WCF, WF
MN>
MN> The next version of VS "Orcas" is still under developing, and only
MN> CTP version is available
MN>
R>> Hello,
R>> (Sorry for my English...)
R>> I am using .NET 2.0 (I'm rather beginner) with Visual Web Developer
R>> 2005
R>> Express Edition, Visual C# 2005 Express Edition and Visual Basic
R>> 2005
R>> Express Edition.
R>> I have downloaded 3.0 Framework (dotnetfx3setup.exe). Shall I use
R>> 2005
R>> Express Edition or should I download new (2006?) versions?
R>> Please help. Thanks in advance.
R>> /RAM/
MN> ---
MN> WBR,
MN> Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
MN> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents
MN> do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
MN>
---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

And how about SDK. Should I install SDK for .NET 2.0?
/RAM/

Hello R.A.M.,

SDK is required only for development, and contains documents, samples, APIs
and etc.

R> And how about SDK. Should I install SDK for .NET 2.0? /RAM/

---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

I know. I am a programmmer. Should I install SDK 2.0?

Show quoteHide quote

Hello R.A.M.,

Yes

R> I know. I am a programmmer. Should I install SDK 2.0?
R>
Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

Thank you (I asked because I was not sure if .NET 3.0 comes with new SDK).

Show quoteHide quote

.NET 3.0 and XP?
Downgrading .Net 2 application to .Net 1.1
Differences/changes between .NET 2.0 and 3.0
.NET 3.0 redistributable package is BIG
CSharp compiler error CS2000