> Hello intrader,
>
> i> Is it possible to run assemblies generated for .NET 1.1 under .NET
> i> 2.0?
>
> Yes
>
> i> I am not sure I am expressing the question properly. The situation is
> i> that we have some developers using Visual Studio 2003 and others
> i> using Visual Studio 2005. Both groups are generating Windows Forms
> i> and Web Applications; the IIS for each group is configured
> i> appropriately with as to the version of the framework. The clients
> i> are are also segregated as to the version of the framework.
> i> i> We would like to configure the clients and the servers with .net 2.0
> i> framework. Will the clients and IIS run .NET 1.1 assemblies?
>
> First, you can specify the version of ASP.NET handler that IIS use
> Second, you can specify the desired assembly version in your app config
>
> ---
> WBR,
> Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>
> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do
> not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
>
>

>> Hello intrader,
>>
>> i> Is it possible to run assemblies generated for .NET 1.1 under .NET
>> i> 2.0?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> i> I am not sure I am expressing the question properly. The situation
>> is
>> i> that we have some developers using Visual Studio 2003 and others
>> i> using Visual Studio 2005. Both groups are generating Windows Forms
>> i> and Web Applications; the IIS for each group is configured
>> i> appropriately with as to the version of the framework. The clients
>> i> are are also segregated as to the version of the framework.
>> i> i> We would like to configure the clients and the servers with
>> .net 2.0
>> i> framework. Will the clients and IIS run .NET 1.1 assemblies?
>> First, you can specify the version of ASP.NET handler that IIS use
>> Second, you can specify the desired assembly version in your app
>> config
>>
>> ---
>> WBR,
>> Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents
>> do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
>>

> Hello intrader,
>
> i> Michael Nemtsev wrote:
> i>
>>> Hello intrader,
>>>
>>> i> Is it possible to run assemblies generated for .NET 1.1 under .NET
>>> i> 2.0?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> i> I am not sure I am expressing the question properly. The situation
>>> is
>>> i> that we have some developers using Visual Studio 2003 and others
>>> i> using Visual Studio 2005. Both groups are generating Windows Forms
>>> i> and Web Applications; the IIS for each group is configured
>>> i> appropriately with as to the version of the framework. The clients
>>> i> are are also segregated as to the version of the framework.
>>> i> i> We would like to configure the clients and the servers with
>>> .net 2.0
>>> i> framework. Will the clients and IIS run .NET 1.1 assemblies?
>>> First, you can specify the version of ASP.NET handler that IIS use
>>> Second, you can specify the desired assembly version in your app
>>> config
>>>
>>> ---
>>> WBR,
>>> Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>>> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents
>>> do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
>>>
> i> As I understand your answers:
> i> 1. NET2.0 runs NET1.1 assemblies runwithout change except that the
> i> app
> i> config must state whether assembly is 1.1 or 2.0. (by the way does
> i> this
> i> affect the build?)
>
> Both version works fine side-by-side, in you 2.0 app u can just
> reference to the desired 1.1 class library and to work without problems.
> Redirect is required when u have the same library but build in different
> versions
>
> i> 2. IIS must be configured for a virtual directory to use the
> i> appropriate
> i> handler.
>
> Yep, as I remember u need just specify the version of aspnet.dll for
> your virtual folder
>
> ---
> WBR,
> Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>
> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do
> not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
>
>