|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Proper way to check that a numerical range "is valid"Hey all, I have an app, that could take two numbers of any type of
numerical type int, long, double, float, uint, ulong, etc. I want to check that the numbers are part of a range that I consider "valid". For my circumstances, I don't consider float.PositiveInfinity valid, nor do I consider the two numbers valid if the second number is smaller than the first. In other words, I want to check that the range is valid. I notice that while float and double have PositiveInfinity int does not. Does int have no comparable concept? They obviously have MaxValue and MinValue, but I'm looking for a concept similar to positive or negative infinity. In summary, I just want to make my valid range check code as robust and thorough as possible. Thanks, Novice <illegal.pr***@gmail.com> wrote in message
Show quote news:1155940316.647515.159020@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... MinValue and MaxValue are as close as you can get for Int (or any > Hey all, I have an app, that could take two numbers of any type of > numerical type int, long, double, float, uint, ulong, etc. I want to > check that the numbers are part of a range that I consider "valid". > For my circumstances, I don't consider float.PositiveInfinity valid, > nor do I consider the two numbers valid if the second number is smaller > than the first. In other words, I want to check that the range is > valid. > > I notice that while float and double have PositiveInfinity int does > not. Does int have no comparable concept? They obviously have > MaxValue and MinValue, but I'm looking for a concept similar to > positive or negative infinity. > > In summary, I just want to make my valid range check code as robust and > thorough as possible. > non-floating point type). These types simply have no concept of infinity - all possible bit patterns of their representations correspond to valid integers within their domain. -cd |
|||||||||||||||||||||||