|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Question on ConfigurationElementCollection design"I have 2 questions on using element collections when building a custom section handler. I'm using the "declarative" model and I can post the code if necessary. My code works and the XML in app.config for my custom section looks like this: MySection name="x" Stores add name="store1" add name="store2" Stores MySection But I have 2 sort of "cosmetic" questions about changing the XML: 1. .... 2. In some cases it might also be nicer to skip the outermost "Stores" element and just have this: MySection name="x" Store name="store1" Store name="store2" MySection But I don't see how to arrange for this in the declarations of a ConfigurationElementCollection. It seems to require the outermost element to key on its name. What I want is sort of an "unnamed" collection of Stores." The first part of the question was answered by using the ConfigurationCollection attribute. Did you ever get a solution to the "unnamed" part (part 2) of your question? I'd like to also add a section collection to my config section and adding a name is redundant. ie., the "Stores" element in you sample. Can an "unnamed" section be added? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||