.net applicationcrashes. at 1.2GB

15 Jun 2006 4:30 PM

Amar

hi.
is ther a reason why a .net application crashes after using 1.2 gb of
physical mrmoey..

I am using the 1.0 framework wth SP3 on windows server 2003.
The application runs on a server with about 2 GB of ram, not other
application on the machine.
has this somthing to do with GC of 1.0,
is there a work around?

15 Jun 2006 11:20 PM

Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)

It should garbage collect and avoid a crash. I would check and make sure you
do not have anything that will not collect (forgot to Dispose() on classes
that use windows resources, for example). The point of crash is possibly
just using too much memory. Leaving 700MB for OS and related is probably
about right.

You might be able to configure to use more memory, but this is not a
guarantee if you have resources that are not properly closed off.

--
Gregory A. Beamer

*************************************************
Think Outside the Box!
*************************************************

Show quote

"Amar" <amarjeetlokha***@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150389033.520081.157140@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> hi.
> is ther a reason why a .net application crashes after using 1.2 gb of
> physical mrmoey..
>
> I am using the 1.0 framework wth SP3 on windows server 2003.
> The application runs on a server with about 2 GB of ram, not other
> application on the machine.
> has this somthing to do with GC of 1.0,
> is there a work around?
>

16 Jun 2006 1:36 AM

Lau Lei Cheong

I'll suggest you to have a memory walk to make sure it's not a problem of
you memory module first.
1.2GB does not seems to be any of suspicious limit to me.

"Amar" <amarjeetlokha***@gmail.com>

???????:1150389033.520081.157***@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Show quote

> hi.
> is ther a reason why a .net application crashes after using 1.2 gb of
> physical mrmoey..
>
> I am using the 1.0 framework wth SP3 on windows server 2003.
> The application runs on a server with about 2 GB of ram, not other
> application on the machine.
> has this somthing to do with GC of 1.0,
> is there a work around?
>