.Net Framework 2.0 and Windows NT 4.0

2 Mar 2006 9:49 AM

Christian Schwendtner

Hi @all.

Does anybody know, if it is possible to use .Net Framework 2.0 with
Windows NT 4.0? (The installation information on the Microsoft website
is not abolutely clear to me).

Thanks.

2 Mar 2006 12:32 PM

José_Manuel_Agüero

Hello ,

You can see the system requirements at:
System Requirements for Version 2.0
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229070.aspx

Particullary:
The .NET Framework cannot be installed on the following operating systems:

Microsoft Windows 95

Microsoft Windows NT® Server

Windows NT Workstation

Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems

Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for Itanium-based Systems

Regards.

Show quote

"Christian Schwendtner" <schwendtner_nospam_at_grz.at> escribió en el mensaje news:uuyFY6dPGHA.3888@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

| Hi @all.
|
| Does anybody know, if it is possible to use .Net Framework 2.0 with
| Windows NT 4.0? (The installation information on the Microsoft website
| is not abolutely clear to me).
|
| Thanks.

2 Mar 2006 12:41 PM

Christian Schwendtner

Hi Jose,

thanks for your fast answer. Somewhere I read that .Net 2.0 can be
installed on Windows NT, if service pack 6.0a is installed - but the
Microsoft homepage tells us something different (probably 1.1 and 2.0
requirements were mixed up by someone).

Thanks for your answer,
Chris

2 Mar 2006 4:48 PM

Patrice

And 1.1 is there :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconnetframeworksystemrequirements.asp

As you can see, you are right. it was mixed up with 1.1 requirements.

--
Patrice

Show quote

"Christian Schwendtner" <schwendtner_nospam_at_grz.at> a écrit dans le
message de news:OTJzvafPGHA.312@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi Jose,
>
> thanks for your fast answer. Somewhere I read that .Net 2.0 can be
> installed on Windows NT, if service pack 6.0a is installed - but the
> Microsoft homepage tells us something different (probably 1.1 and 2.0
> requirements were mixed up by someone).
>
> Thanks for your answer,
> Chris
>