|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
named pipesHi ,
using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes. After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I looks like this would still be done via interop. Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is true, or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named pipes that I've missed ? thanks Gerry Try these:
http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart1.asp http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart2.asp These articles are using .NET 1.1, but the code, for the most part, should work with .NET 2.0. Also, do a Google search on "named pipes" and ".net framework". -- Show quoteChristopher A. Reed "The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient." "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message news:Ou0yDMYKGHA.344@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Hi , > using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes. > After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I looks > like this would still be done via interop. > Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is > true, > or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named pipes > that > I've missed ? > > thanks > Gerry > > Thanks christopher , I had already found those links among others.
I was more interested in whether or not this was something that had been included natively in the framework and I just wasn't finding it. thanks again Show quote "Christopher Reed" <carttu@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:#FM5gEZKGHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Try these: > > http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart1.asp > http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart2.asp > > These articles are using .NET 1.1, but the code, for the most part, should > work with .NET 2.0. > > Also, do a Google search on "named pipes" and ".net framework". > -- > Christopher A. Reed > "The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient." > > "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message > news:Ou0yDMYKGHA.344@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > Hi , > > using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes. > > After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I looks > > like this would still be done via interop. > > Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is > > true, > > or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named pipes > > that > > I've missed ? > > > > thanks > > Gerry > > > > > > It's not included 'natively' in the .NET framework.
But I think you suffer from some misconception. Include 'natively' in the .NET framework usually mean plenty of interop under the hood. Show quote "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message news:euF9chbKGHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Thanks christopher , I had already found those links among others. > I was more interested in whether or not this was something that had been > included natively in the framework and I just wasn't finding it. > > thanks again > > > "Christopher Reed" <carttu@nospam.nospam> wrote in message > news:#FM5gEZKGHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >> Try these: >> >> http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart1.asp >> http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart2.asp >> >> These articles are using .NET 1.1, but the code, for the most part, >> should >> work with .NET 2.0. >> >> Also, do a Google search on "named pipes" and ".net framework". >> -- >> Christopher A. Reed >> "The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient." >> >> "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message >> news:Ou0yDMYKGHA.344@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> > Hi , >> > using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes. >> > After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I >> > looks >> > like this would still be done via interop. >> > Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is >> > true, >> > or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named pipes >> > that >> > I've missed ? >> > >> > thanks >> > Gerry >> > >> > >> >> > > 'suffer' ???
no misconceptions here - I couldn't care less what's 'under the hood' - if I don't have code it then that's native enough for me. Show quote "Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld> wrote in message news:eYb5wOeKGHA.1832@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > It's not included 'natively' in the .NET framework. > But I think you suffer from some misconception. > Include 'natively' in the .NET framework usually mean plenty of interop > under the hood. > > "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message > news:euF9chbKGHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > Thanks christopher , I had already found those links among others. > > I was more interested in whether or not this was something that had been > > included natively in the framework and I just wasn't finding it. > > > > thanks again > > > > > > "Christopher Reed" <carttu@nospam.nospam> wrote in message > > news:#FM5gEZKGHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > >> Try these: > >> > >> http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart1.asp > >> http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart2.asp > >> > >> These articles are using .NET 1.1, but the code, for the most part, > >> should > >> work with .NET 2.0. > >> > >> Also, do a Google search on "named pipes" and ".net framework". > >> -- > >> Christopher A. Reed > >> "The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient." > >> > >> "gerry" <g***@canada.com> wrote in message > >> news:Ou0yDMYKGHA.344@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > >> > Hi , > >> > using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes. > >> > After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I > >> > looks > >> > like this would still be done via interop. > >> > Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is > >> > true, > >> > or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named pipes > >> > that > >> > I've missed ? > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > Gerry > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics