|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Support for obsolete methodsframework. We have a bunch of common assemblies and two UI platforms (Web and Windows). Both of the UI platforms reference the common assemblies. The Web apps will be migrated first, and a few months later, the Windows apps will follow. The question revolves around the best way to deal with the common assemblies. The common code references a bunch of deprecated classes. For example, the use of Configuration.ConfigurationSettings has been deprecated with Configuration.ConfiguationManager. Our code references other deprecated classes, this is just one example of many. We plan to compile the common code for each of the target environments separately (one set built in VS2003, and the other in VS2005), but I'd like to manage only one version of the common source code files. After both platforms are migrated, then we'll refactor the common source code to replace all the deprecated classes. Can you think of any reason that this might not work, or be undesirable in any way? Thanks! --steve |
|||||||||||||||||||||||