|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggestions for a architectureI have a database table with columns of URLs and datatimes. At the
precise datetime I would like to a perform HTTP Get request to the URL. There may be multiple requests to different URLs that need to be performed at the same time. It doesn't seem efficient to have a service polling the database every second looking for requests to process. I have been doing a bit of research into MSMQ and SQL Service Broker in SQL Server 2005. But the messages seem to be processed in the order they arrive not on a specific datetime value. Any pointers for what would be the best design approach? Hello,
With Service Broker you could use dialog timers. Open a dialog for each request you need, and then create a timer on that dialog set to fire at the moment you desire. You can add Service Broker activation into the mix so that the timer actually lauches an CLR stored procedure that goes and does the HTTP request. This way you don't actually need any external code, is all contained within the database. In addition, you get durable, persistent timers. Dialog timers are stored in the database, so you get all the benefits that come with this, like persistent state between server restarts, backup/restore. If high availability is desired you also get clustering failover and database mirroring for free. -- Show quoteThis posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. HTH, ~ Remus Rusanu SQL Service Broker <g_hick***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1131493173.394514.58820@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >I have a database table with columns of URLs and datatimes. At the > precise datetime I would like to a perform HTTP Get request to the URL. > There may be multiple requests to different URLs that need to be > performed at the same time. > > It doesn't seem efficient to have a service polling the database every > second looking for requests to process. > > I have been doing a bit of research into MSMQ and SQL Service Broker in > SQL Server 2005. But the messages seem to be processed in the order > they arrive not on a specific datetime value. > > Any pointers for what would be the best design approach? > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||