|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Visual Studio and Framework 2.0 and Framework 1.XWe program using Visual Studio and have followed the beta closely and now
its time to install the real thing on real developer workstations. Our issue is this: About 50 per cent of our c# code in targeted for a system which does not support 2.0 (at least not until Q1/06). Can any one point me at a white paper on using VS 2005 and targeting SOME solutions for Framework 1.X and SOME solutions for Framework 2.0? thanks dlr You can have VS.NET 2003 and VS.NET 2005 side by side...
-- Show quotePatrice "D Redfield" <dennis_redfield@newsgroup.nospam> a écrit dans le message de news:OiVfMu83FHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > We program using Visual Studio and have followed the beta closely and now > its time to install the real thing on real developer workstations. Our > issue is this: About 50 per cent of our c# code in targeted for a system > which does not support 2.0 (at least not until Q1/06). Can any one point me > at a white paper on using VS 2005 and targeting SOME solutions for Framework > 1.X and SOME solutions for Framework 2.0? > > thanks > > dlr > > I thought we better options. I know that VS2005 has an option to restrict
to v1.X syntax. But you are saying there is no way to get VS2005 to compile for Framework 1.X? Seems like a poor option to require two IDE's to be installed but if that is what it takes, that's what it takes.... dlr Show quote "Patrice" <nob***@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:%23NGK0z83FHA.700@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > You can have VS.NET 2003 and VS.NET 2005 side by side... > > -- > Patrice > > "D Redfield" <dennis_redfield@newsgroup.nospam> a écrit dans le message de > news:OiVfMu83FHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > We program using Visual Studio and have followed the beta closely and now > > its time to install the real thing on real developer workstations. Our > > issue is this: About 50 per cent of our c# code in targeted for a system > > which does not support 2.0 (at least not until Q1/06). Can any one point > me > > at a white paper on using VS 2005 and targeting SOME solutions for > Framework > > 1.X and SOME solutions for Framework 2.0? > > > > thanks > > > > dlr > > > > > > Hi
In the source code level, the 1.1 and 2.0 code is compatible to some extent. e.g. The Form.Show code is same for .NET 2.0 and .NET 1.1. But some component is only in the .NET 2.0 but no .NET 1.1. e.g. the WebBrowser managed control is only instroduced in .NET 2.0. Also the solution file in 2.0 will no be opened with 1.1, but 1.1's solution can be opened in .NET 2.0(it will invoke a convertion dialog). So for your scenario, I suggest you run the .NET 2.0 code in .NET 2.0 but not .NET 1.1, otherwise you will have to do many manually adjusts, Best regards, Peter Huang Microsoft Online Partner Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. You will have to have both VS.NET and VS 2005 installed and edit each
project in its own IDE. You can develop in one and target another, but it will require compilation in the proper framework and close attention to any breaking changes: -- Show quoteGregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA *********************************************** Think Outside the Box! *********************************************** "D Redfield" <dennis_redfield@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:OiVfMu83FHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > We program using Visual Studio and have followed the beta closely and now > its time to install the real thing on real developer workstations. Our > issue is this: About 50 per cent of our c# code in targeted for a system > which does not support 2.0 (at least not until Q1/06). Can any one point > me > at a white paper on using VS 2005 and targeting SOME solutions for > Framework > 1.X and SOME solutions for Framework 2.0? > > thanks > > dlr > > You will have to have both VS.NET and VS 2005 installed and edit each
project in its own IDE. You can develop in one and target another, but it will require compilation in the proper framework and close attention to any breaking changes: http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/programming/breakingchanges/default.aspx -- Show quoteGregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA *********************************************** Think Outside the Box! *********************************************** "D Redfield" <dennis_redfield@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:OiVfMu83FHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > We program using Visual Studio and have followed the beta closely and now > its time to install the real thing on real developer workstations. Our > issue is this: About 50 per cent of our c# code in targeted for a system > which does not support 2.0 (at least not until Q1/06). Can any one point > me > at a white paper on using VS 2005 and targeting SOME solutions for > Framework > 1.X and SOME solutions for Framework 2.0? > > thanks > > dlr > >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics