"Prasad Venkat" wrote:

> Hi,
> Question from a newbie to C#. How effective is C# with respect to
> serialization techniques and object persistence ?
> also, I'm trying to create an application in C#  in .Net framework. are
> there are pros and cons that one needs to be aware of when compared to C++ ?
>
> your feedback is appreciated
>
> Prasad

"john conwell" wrote:

> Well, if your using the built in serialization it doesnt matter because its
> all IL under the hood.  the Framework classes take care of the serialization
> for you, your code doesnt actually do the serialization (well, by default) it
> just points at what to serialize.
>
> Now if you are doing custom serialization than if written correctly, the C++
> should be faster, but not by much.
>
> "Prasad Venkat" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Question from a newbie to C#. How effective is C# with respect to
> > serialization techniques and object persistence ?
> > also, I'm trying to create an application in C#  in .Net framework. are
> > there are pros and cons that one needs to be aware of when compared to C++ ?
> >
> > your feedback is appreciated
> >
> > Prasad

"Prasad Venkat" <PrasadVen***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:DD933538-C084-48EC-B6D4-36D0E8E00105@microsoft.com...
> John,
> thanks for your response.... that answers what I was looking for.
>
> "john conwell" wrote:
>
>> Well, if your using the built in serialization it doesnt matter because
>> its
>> all IL under the hood.  the Framework classes take care of the
>> serialization
>> for you, your code doesnt actually do the serialization (well, by
>> default) it
>> just points at what to serialize.
>>
>> Now if you are doing custom serialization than if written correctly, the
>> C++
>> should be faster, but not by much.
>>
>> "Prasad Venkat" wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > Question from a newbie to C#. How effective is C# with respect to
>> > serialization techniques and object persistence ?
>> > also, I'm trying to create an application in C#  in .Net framework. are
>> > there are pros and cons that one needs to be aware of when compared to
>> > C++ ?
>> >
>> > your feedback is appreciated
>> >
>> > Prasad

"Lloyd Dupont" <l*@NewsAccount.galador.net> wrote in message
news:O$1jrWHzFHA.2812@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Actually I think Serialization is one area where C++ performs slower (for
> some unknown reason).
> You have to know there is a FALSE belief that ManagedC++ is faster C#.
> There was an article on MSDN on this topic, but I can't find it again...
>
> --
> There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary
> and those who don't.
> "Prasad Venkat" <PrasadVen***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:DD933538-C084-48EC-B6D4-36D0E8E00105@microsoft.com...
>> John,
>> thanks for your response.... that answers what I was looking for.
>>
>> "john conwell" wrote:
>>
>>> Well, if your using the built in serialization it doesnt matter because
>>> its
>>> all IL under the hood.  the Framework classes take care of the
>>> serialization
>>> for you, your code doesnt actually do the serialization (well, by
>>> default) it
>>> just points at what to serialize.
>>>
>>> Now if you are doing custom serialization than if written correctly, the
>>> C++
>>> should be faster, but not by much.
>>>
>>> "Prasad Venkat" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Question from a newbie to C#. How effective is C# with respect to
>>> > serialization techniques and object persistence ?
>>> > also, I'm trying to create an application in C#  in .Net framework.
>>> > are
>>> > there are pros and cons that one needs to be aware of when compared to
>>> > C++ ?
>>> >
>>> > your feedback is appreciated
>>> >
>>> > Prasad
>
>

"Lloyd Dupont" wrote:

> > Heck, Lloyd, you don't need to reference an ariticle. Managed code is
> > managed code, regardless of the syntax. It's all MSIL under the covers.
> > Managed C++ LOOKS like C++, but that's just skin deep.
> >
> Oops.. probably it was plain C++ vs C# in fact...
>
>
>