|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
relation between .Net framework and .NetWhat is the relation between .Net (2002, 2003) & .Net Framework (v1.0, 1.1..)
Is one a subset of the other? I assume you mean VS.Net (2002, 2003) Visual studio provides an environment
to do .Net development in several different languages. There are two versions of Visual Studio, 2002 and 2003, there will soon be 2005. The dotNet framework has two versions as well 1.0 and 1.1. These are the support files that must be on a client pc to run a .net application. Visual Studio 2002 works with .Net Framework 1.0 and Visual Studio 2003 works with both 1.0 & 1.1 of the framework. Does this clear it up enough for you? Chris Show quote "sauj" <s***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E52F0856-B69D-4BBE-BBA0-8C6E265B0596@microsoft.com... > What is the relation between .Net (2002, 2003) & .Net Framework (v1.0, > 1.1..) > Is one a subset of the other? Thanx.
I couldn't find this info on microsoft.com. Where did you find the answer? Follow up question: Does it mean that if i already have .Net Framework 1.1 installed on my PC & I want to install VS .Net 2002, I will still have to install .Net framework 1.0 -sauj Show quote "Chris, Master of All Things Insignifican" wrote: > I assume you mean VS.Net (2002, 2003) Visual studio provides an environment > to do .Net development in several different languages. There are two > versions of Visual Studio, 2002 and 2003, there will soon be 2005. The > dotNet framework has two versions as well 1.0 and 1.1. These are the > support files that must be on a client pc to run a .net application. Visual > Studio 2002 works with .Net Framework 1.0 and Visual Studio 2003 works with > both 1.0 & 1.1 of the framework. > > Does this clear it up enough for you? > Chris > > > > "sauj" <s***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:E52F0856-B69D-4BBE-BBA0-8C6E265B0596@microsoft.com... > > What is the relation between .Net (2002, 2003) & .Net Framework (v1.0, > > 1.1..) > > Is one a subset of the other? > > > I didn't "find" it. I've just been playing in .Net a long time. Yes,
VS.Net 2002 does not play nicely with Framework 1.1 There is no issue with installing both 1.0 and 1.1 at the same time. Good luck Chris Ps. I think it's a pretty cheap upgrade to go up to 2002 Show quote "sauj" <s***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6D31BECC-77DE-4139-BFBC-0A1ABB7891A2@microsoft.com... > Thanx. > I couldn't find this info on microsoft.com. > Where did you find the answer? > > Follow up question: > Does it mean that if i already have .Net Framework 1.1 installed on my PC > & > I want > to install VS .Net 2002, I will still have to install .Net framework 1.0 > > -sauj > > "Chris, Master of All Things Insignifican" wrote: > >> I assume you mean VS.Net (2002, 2003) Visual studio provides an >> environment >> to do .Net development in several different languages. There are two >> versions of Visual Studio, 2002 and 2003, there will soon be 2005. The >> dotNet framework has two versions as well 1.0 and 1.1. These are the >> support files that must be on a client pc to run a .net application. >> Visual >> Studio 2002 works with .Net Framework 1.0 and Visual Studio 2003 works >> with >> both 1.0 & 1.1 of the framework. >> >> Does this clear it up enough for you? >> Chris >> >> >> >> "sauj" <s***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:E52F0856-B69D-4BBE-BBA0-8C6E265B0596@microsoft.com... >> > What is the relation between .Net (2002, 2003) & .Net Framework (v1.0, >> > 1.1..) >> > Is one a subset of the other? >> >> >> Also, for your information, sauj, Visual Studio 2005 will be the
development environment for the new .NET Framework 2.0. This version will be known as Visual Studio 2005 and not Visual Studio .NET 2005. It's possible that the term ".NET" will be phased out over the next 2 years in favor of a new term. :-) Why is visual studio coupled to a specific version of the .net framework.
for example, if I wrote a c++ dll using visual studion 2003, i would be able to compile it with 2002, so why not with the.net framework? Show quote "Chris, Master of All Things Insignificant" <chris@No_Spam_Please.com> wrote in message news:#q8iAfO#EHA.2192@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > I assume you mean VS.Net (2002, 2003) Visual studio provides an environment > to do .Net development in several different languages. There are two > versions of Visual Studio, 2002 and 2003, there will soon be 2005. The > dotNet framework has two versions as well 1.0 and 1.1. These are the > support files that must be on a client pc to run a .net application. Visual > Studio 2002 works with .Net Framework 1.0 and Visual Studio 2003 works with > both 1.0 & 1.1 of the framework. > > Does this clear it up enough for you? > Chris > > > > "sauj" <s***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:E52F0856-B69D-4BBE-BBA0-8C6E265B0596@microsoft.com... > > What is the relation between .Net (2002, 2003) & .Net Framework (v1.0, > > 1.1..) > > Is one a subset of the other? > > Jeremy Chapman wrote:
> Why is visual studio coupled to a specific version of the .net because VS.NET uses the framework. devenv.exe is NOT a ,NET app, it is an > framework. unmanaged APP, (and AFAIK was written in MFC), instead VS.NET hosts the .NET runtime so that it can load some .NET classes like the property grid and the extensibility objects that you write. > for example, if I wrote a c++ dll using visual studion It will compile the code with whatever version of the compiler it has. If > 2003, i would be able to compile it with 2002, so why not with > the.net framework? you have VS2002 then it will be installed with the v1.0 version of the compilers and will load those. VS2003 will load v1.1 version of the compilers. Doesn't that sound reasonable? Its always been like that, specific versions of VS are supplied with specific versions of the compilers. Richard  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics