|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
I have two questions about the TableAdapter Configuration Wizardadapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored procedures, because I check the option that says: Create methods to send updates directly to the database (GenerateDBDirectMethods) The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); But I want the INSERT sql to be: INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to read back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the text select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do it manually? 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. For example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a SELECT sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter is a SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a DataAdapter and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. I just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to do what I want? Thanks in advance, John Big Daddy,
Be aware that a where clause is nice, but as long as a row does not change, the dataadapter (which the tableadapter inherits from) does never give a row to the database to update. To add to the designer created class you can add a partial clase where you can put all your delete transact code in. You are than even able to recreate the designer generated part. I hope this gives some ideas, Cor Show quote "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht news:1165594247.650561.161200@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > 1. I have a table in the database (SQL Server) that I created an > adapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has > select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored > procedures, because I check the option that says: > > Create methods to send updates directly to the database > (GenerateDBDirectMethods) > > The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: > > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); > > But I want the INSERT sql to be: > > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * from > Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > > Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to read > back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the > text > > select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > > To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard > automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do it > manually? > > > 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored > procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. For > example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one > TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio > button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a SELECT > sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter is a > SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a DataAdapter > and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I > want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. I > just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to do > what I want? > > Thanks in advance, > John > Thanks,
Does anyone have any ideas on question #2 from my original post? Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote: Show quote > Big Daddy, > > Be aware that a where clause is nice, but as long as a row does not change, > the dataadapter (which the tableadapter inherits from) does never give a row > to the database to update. > > To add to the designer created class you can add a partial clase where you > can put all your delete transact code in. You are than even able to recreate > the designer generated part. > > I hope this gives some ideas, > > Cor > > > "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht > news:1165594247.650561.161200@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > 1. I have a table in the database (SQL Server) that I created an > > adapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has > > select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored > > procedures, because I check the option that says: > > > > Create methods to send updates directly to the database > > (GenerateDBDirectMethods) > > > > The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: > > > > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); > > > > But I want the INSERT sql to be: > > > > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * from > > Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > > > > Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to read > > back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the > > text > > > > select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > > > > To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard > > automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do it > > manually? > > > > > > 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored > > procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. For > > example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one > > TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio > > button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a SELECT > > sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter is a > > SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a DataAdapter > > and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I > > want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. I > > just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to do > > what I want? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > John > > What's the purpose of the TableAdapter if you don't want a table to manage?
Are you simply looking for a way to invoke SPs more easily? -- Show quote____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________ Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book: Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition) and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1165875115.907480.180050@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > Thanks, > Does anyone have any ideas on question #2 from my original post? > > > Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote: >> Big Daddy, >> >> Be aware that a where clause is nice, but as long as a row does not >> change, >> the dataadapter (which the tableadapter inherits from) does never give a >> row >> to the database to update. >> >> To add to the designer created class you can add a partial clase where >> you >> can put all your delete transact code in. You are than even able to >> recreate >> the designer generated part. >> >> I hope this gives some ideas, >> >> Cor >> >> >> "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht >> news:1165594247.650561.161200@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> > 1. I have a table in the database (SQL Server) that I created an >> > adapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has >> > select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored >> > procedures, because I check the option that says: >> > >> > Create methods to send updates directly to the database >> > (GenerateDBDirectMethods) >> > >> > The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: >> > >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); >> > >> > But I want the INSERT sql to be: >> > >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * from >> > Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) >> > >> > Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to read >> > back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the >> > text >> > >> > select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) >> > >> > To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard >> > automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do it >> > manually? >> > >> > >> > 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored >> > procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. For >> > example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one >> > TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio >> > button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a SELECT >> > sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter is a >> > SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a DataAdapter >> > and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I >> > want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. I >> > just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to do >> > what I want? >> > >> > Thanks in advance, >> > John >> > > Yes, exactly. I want it to create an easy C# interface to invoke SPs.
So if I have a SP called DeleteOrder, it will create a C# function for me called DeleteOrder(). thanks, John William (Bill) Vaughn wrote: Show quote > What's the purpose of the TableAdapter if you don't want a table to manage? > Are you simply looking for a way to invoke SPs more easily? > > -- > ____________________________________ > William (Bill) Vaughn > Author, Mentor, Consultant > Microsoft MVP > INETA Speaker > www.betav.com/blog/billva > www.betav.com > Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > __________________________________ > Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book: > Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition) > and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1165875115.907480.180050@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > > Thanks, > > Does anyone have any ideas on question #2 from my original post? > > > > > > Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote: > >> Big Daddy, > >> > >> Be aware that a where clause is nice, but as long as a row does not > >> change, > >> the dataadapter (which the tableadapter inherits from) does never give a > >> row > >> to the database to update. > >> > >> To add to the designer created class you can add a partial clase where > >> you > >> can put all your delete transact code in. You are than even able to > >> recreate > >> the designer generated part. > >> > >> I hope this gives some ideas, > >> > >> Cor > >> > >> > >> "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht > >> news:1165594247.650561.161200@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > >> > 1. I have a table in the database (SQL Server) that I created an > >> > adapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has > >> > select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored > >> > procedures, because I check the option that says: > >> > > >> > Create methods to send updates directly to the database > >> > (GenerateDBDirectMethods) > >> > > >> > The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: > >> > > >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); > >> > > >> > But I want the INSERT sql to be: > >> > > >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * from > >> > Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > >> > > >> > Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to read > >> > back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the > >> > text > >> > > >> > select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) > >> > > >> > To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard > >> > automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do it > >> > manually? > >> > > >> > > >> > 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored > >> > procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. For > >> > example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one > >> > TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio > >> > button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a SELECT > >> > sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter is a > >> > SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a DataAdapter > >> > and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I > >> > want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. I > >> > just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to do > >> > what I want? > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance, > >> > John > >> > > > Consider that the VS team is pretty "table oriented" and has take OUT
functionality to make invoking SPs easier. I would look around for a 3rd party app to do this. I checked with RedGate but they did not support this. I also passed a note to the dev team asking if they knew of a tool to build this code. I expect that the problem with third-party tools might have something to do with the difficulty in adding functionality to VS2005. I'll keep looking. -- Show quote____________________________________ William (Bill) Vaughn Author, Mentor, Consultant Microsoft MVP INETA Speaker www.betav.com/blog/billva www.betav.com Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. __________________________________ Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book: Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition) and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1165988056.826511.101210@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Yes, exactly. I want it to create an easy C# interface to invoke SPs. > So if I have a SP called DeleteOrder, it will create a C# function for > me called DeleteOrder(). > thanks, > John > > William (Bill) Vaughn wrote: >> What's the purpose of the TableAdapter if you don't want a table to >> manage? >> Are you simply looking for a way to invoke SPs more easily? >> >> -- >> ____________________________________ >> William (Bill) Vaughn >> Author, Mentor, Consultant >> Microsoft MVP >> INETA Speaker >> www.betav.com/blog/billva >> www.betav.com >> Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. >> __________________________________ >> Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book: >> Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition) >> and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook) >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:1165875115.907480.180050@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... >> > Thanks, >> > Does anyone have any ideas on question #2 from my original post? >> > >> > >> > Cor Ligthert [MVP] wrote: >> >> Big Daddy, >> >> >> >> Be aware that a where clause is nice, but as long as a row does not >> >> change, >> >> the dataadapter (which the tableadapter inherits from) does never give >> >> a >> >> row >> >> to the database to update. >> >> >> >> To add to the designer created class you can add a partial clase where >> >> you >> >> can put all your delete transact code in. You are than even able to >> >> recreate >> >> the designer generated part. >> >> >> >> I hope this gives some ideas, >> >> >> >> Cor >> >> >> >> >> >> "Big Daddy" <johngil***@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht >> >> news:1165594247.650561.161200@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> >> > 1. I have a table in the database (SQL Server) that I created an >> >> > adapter for using Visual Studio 2005. It has >> >> > select/insert/delete/update methods created, but not using stored >> >> > procedures, because I check the option that says: >> >> > >> >> > Create methods to send updates directly to the database >> >> > (GenerateDBDirectMethods) >> >> > >> >> > The INSERT sql that is created by the wizard is: >> >> > >> >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); >> >> > >> >> > But I want the INSERT sql to be: >> >> > >> >> > INSERT INTO [Patients] ([PatientId]) VALUES (@PatientId); select * >> >> > from >> >> > Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) >> >> > >> >> > Because there's an identity autonumber in the table that I want to >> >> > read >> >> > back into my DataTable after in the insert. So I manually added the >> >> > text >> >> > >> >> > select * from Patients WHERE (PatientNo = @@IDENTITY) >> >> > >> >> > To the insert statement. Is there any way to make the wizard >> >> > automatically add this to the INSERT statement so I don't have to do >> >> > it >> >> > manually? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2. I want to have a TableAdapter that encapsulates a bunch of stored >> >> > procedures, but that doesn't have a DataTable that goes with it. >> >> > For >> >> > example, I might have 10 delete sprocs that I want to put into one >> >> > TableAdapter. When I create a new TableAdapter, I select the radio >> >> > button "use existing stored procedures". It forces me to have a >> >> > SELECT >> >> > sproc, even though none of the sprocs I want to put in the adapter >> >> > is a >> >> > SELECT. So if I choose a SELECT sproc first, it creates a >> >> > DataAdapter >> >> > and DataTable for me. Then I can add all of my DELETE sprocs that I >> >> > want to. But I don't want the DataTable or the SELECT query at all. >> >> > I >> >> > just want to put in a bunch of DELETE sprocs. Is there any way to >> >> > do >> >> > what I want? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks in advance, >> >> > John >> >> > >> > > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||