|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
URGENT...Please suggest how can we implement transactions at BAL in 3 tier architecture not in DAL.Hi,
Please suggest how can we implement transactions at BAL in 3 tier architecture not in DAL. also objectcontext object which was used with ASP will be requiered to do this. Thanks Ravi Unfortunately the answer isn't as simple as your question is.
Transactions implemented in the database are a lot simpler because the database maintains transactions via log mechanisms. It can offer you fantastic control over isolation levels - which in turn give you a much more responsive application. In contrast, transactions on non-database entities are controlled by a transaction co-ordinator - MSDTC if in case you are using ObjectContext in classic ASP. This will invariably bump up your isolation levels in most instances, and hence lead to a practically unusable production application. An easy way to create a good implementation is using .NET 2.0/SQL Server 2005/System.Transactions - but apparently you are too far from that architecture. Given all of these, I would keep most of your transactions in the DAL, rather than BL. It sounds like a good idea to make BL operations transactional, but that requirement is best addressed by proper design of the BL, not expecting MSDTC/MTS/COM+/EnterpriseServices to take care of this for you. - Sahil Malik [MVP] ADO.NET 2.0 book - http://codebetter.com/blogs/sahil.malik/archive/2005/05/13/63199.aspx ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <ravi.vasw***@gmail.com> wrote in message Show quote news:1141114282.017335.88020@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... > Hi, > > Please suggest how can we implement transactions at BAL in 3 tier > architecture not in DAL. also objectcontext object which was used with > ASP will be requiered to do this. > > Thanks > Ravi > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||