|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
O/R Mapper for dotnetSome of the requiriments could be -Enterprise level -Caching strategi -Stability -oracle support I have been looking at the following: http://ibatis.apache.org http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html and NHibernate /Klaus Add
- Developer Express' XPO (v2 is in beta) and - LLBLGenPro - Paul Wilsons' ORMapper I guess it depends on your needs. And avoid DLinq for now as it is in *tech preview* phase only. -- Show quoteMiha Markic [MVP C#] RightHand .NET consulting & development www.rthand.com Blog: http://cs.rthand.com/blogs/blog_with_righthand/ "Klaus Hebsgaard" <kheb***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1139649196.965659.119940@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > Has anyone in her got experience with O/R Mappers for dotnet? > Some of the requiriments could be > -Enterprise level > -Caching strategi > -Stability > -oracle support > > > I have been looking at the following: > > http://ibatis.apache.org > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ > > http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html > > and NHibernate > > /Klaus > I want to download .net framework versio 2.0.50125 and I didn't find
is there some one who can help me? *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework
Show quote "afifo_007 afifo_007" <afifo_***@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:urjwpvvLGHA.3260@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >I want to download .net framework versio 2.0.50125 and I didn't find > is there some one who can help me? > > > > *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** Klaus Hebsgaard wrote:
> Has anyone in her got experience with O/R Mappers for dotnet? we have a lot of enterprise level users, and a lot of systems have> Some of the requiriments could be > -Enterprise level been made with LLBLGen Pro which have 500 tables/views or more (some even 2500+ tables) > -Caching strategi Caching can be 'nice' but remember that caching is often not worth theeffort, for a couple of reasons: - only in single entity fetches a cache can help you. If you fetch a set of entities, you first always have to consult the persistent storage, then pull in the entities not already in the cache, or refresh the entities already in the cache. this is often slower. - .NET doesn't have cross-appdomain object awareness. This means that if your application works on a webfarm/ server farm, your code will have to consult an external cache system, to be sure the objects are in a cache or not. This means that this is AND slower, AND you effectively re-do what's already build into every normal RDBMS: data cache. > -Stability Our code is very stable and mature (live since sept 2003). We also usea policy where fixes have to be released a.s.a.p. so if a customer reports an issue, a fix is available soon thereafter so you never have to wait a long time for a service pack or quaterly roll up. > -oracle support We support oracle 8i-10g through ODP.NET. Frans -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Excuse me, but are you Frans Bouma somehow affiliated with LLBLGen?
If so, I think it would be appropiate for you to introduce yourself as such! If you are not in any way affiliated with LLBLGen please accecpt my excuse in advance !!! /Klaus Klaus Hebsgaard wrote:
> Excuse me, but are you Frans Bouma somehow affiliated with LLBLGen? I wrote LLBLGen Pro and own the company.> > If so, I think it would be appropiate for you to introduce yourself as > such! > > If you are not in any way affiliated with LLBLGen please accecpt my > excuse in advance !!! I thought the signature I use is enough to explain that I'm affiliated with the company, it's never my intention to pretend I'm an outsider advicing a product, if I gave that impression, my appologies. Frans -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frans,
Not to offence you. However, for me it took as well a long time before I understood that. (I know the easy answer on that) You write very much about the product in the third person and shows not direct affection with it. I would keep it that way. However put by instance those two words extra in this Get my product LLBLGen Pro It would prevent misunderstandings, I have seen more misunderstanding in these newsgroups in discussions about this subject. :-) Feel free to do what you want with my text.Cor Show quote > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com > My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma > Microsoft MVP (C#) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message Yeah, well, the other option is that he is promoting LLBLGenPro in the news:eliYO0HMGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Frans, > > Not to offence you. However, for me it took as well a long time before I > understood that. footer just for fun. ;-) Gee, who knows if my company is RightHand? :-) -- Miha Markic [MVP C#] RightHand .NET consulting & development www.rthand.com Blog: http://cs.rthand.com/blogs/blog_with_righthand/ > Yeah, well, the other option is that he is promoting LLBLGenPro in the I never saw you write about that company as the best there is, that is the > footer just for fun. ;-) > Gee, who knows if my company is RightHand? :-) > Is it? :-) slight difference. If people would ask me: "do you know somebody in Slovenia related to Net?, than I probably would set this in the message. Miha Markic [MVP C#] RightHand .NET consulting & development www.rthand.com Blog: http://cs.rthand.com/blogs/blog_with_righthand/ As long as Frans not is writting about LLBLGenPro than it is clear that it is his product. If that is not, than it can be a link to the product. However you will not agree this with me, feel free. Cor Miha Markic [MVP C#] wrote:
> That's my position on the matter as well :). In all these years I'm> > > "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message > news:eliYO0HMGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > > Frans, > > > > Not to offence you. However, for me it took as well a long time > > before I understood that. > > Yeah, well, the other option is that he is promoting LLBLGenPro in > the footer just for fun. ;-) wandering through the usenet dungeons, I've never seen a post of a person who promited a commercial product in the signature and wasn't affiliated with it in some way ;). That said, I could have formulated it a bit different in the original posting. Confusion is never good. FB -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First of all I didn't check out your signature, so many people write so
many crazy things in their signature, you can spen dhalf if your tíme reading signatures. That's my mistake (that i didn't read it ;-) Second from your signature it is not obvious that you own the company just that you somehow like the product: - either because you are a nerd who like the product you use - or because you are some kind of business partner, which would fit very well with the fact that you highli recommend the product. - or because you own the company... I would prefer that you state very clear that you own the company that you so highly reccomend in a newsgroup. I believe that no matter how hard you strive you can not be objective when it comes to your own product! Thnak you for clearing up the ambougity (<-- don't think that was spelled correct). /Klaus Klaus Hebsgaard wrote:
> First of all I didn't check out your signature, so many people write As I said, I assumed that it was clear, but that wasn't the case so I> so many crazy things in their signature, you can spen dhalf if your > tíme reading signatures. > That's my mistake (that i didn't read it ;-) > Second from your signature it is not obvious that you own the company > just that you somehow like the product: > - either because you are a nerd who like the product you use > - or because you are some kind of business partner, which would fit > very well with the fact that you highli recommend the product. > - or because you own the company... will me more clear and unambiguous in the future :). > I would prefer that you state very clear that you own the company that that's true :) > you so highly reccomend in a newsgroup. I believe that no matter how > hard you strive you can not be objective when it comes to your own > product! FB -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ " As I said, I assumed that it was clear, but that wasn't the case so I
will me more clear and unambiguous in the future :). " It's OK, I live in Denmark where 12 drawings of a certain prophet has caused a whole lot more stir than it was first assumed, so I know what you are talking about ;-) So lets close the case /Klaus I was going to recommend LLBLGenPro with an explanation of how it fits into
your scenario, but Frans has provided it straight from the horse's mouth. If you look at his client list though, it's pretty clear it's quite applicable for Enterprise scenarios and I don't know of a single LLBLGenPro user that doesn't love it Show quote "Klaus Hebsgaard" <kheb***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1139649196.965659.119940@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > Has anyone in her got experience with O/R Mappers for dotnet? > Some of the requiriments could be > -Enterprise level > -Caching strategi > -Stability > -oracle support > > > I have been looking at the following: > > http://ibatis.apache.org > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ > > http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html > > and NHibernate > > /Klaus > >Has anyone in her got experience with O/R Mappers for dotnet? Yes, we've started using NHibernate a while ago and it works quite>and NHibernate well so far (for MS SQL Server, in our case). It definitely supports Oracle, too, and being a port from Hibernate, it's quite mature and well tested, too. Marc >>Has anyone in her got experience with O/R Mappers for dotnet? See Shawn "The ADO Guy" Wildermuth's article "Getting started with>>and NHibernate NHibnerate" on DevSource for an excellent intro: http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1925698,00.asp Marc |
|||||||||||||||||||||||