|
dev
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Application Architecture questionoperation? In other words, the desktop machine is totally off the network, should the app still work? I agree with Radek - why duplicate the business logic? instead, Re-use it from different client types! Show quote "Radek Cerny" <radek.cerny@asplications.nospam.com.au> wrote in message news:u4QMoF5xEHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > If the "Standalone" workstations are connected to the net, have a read of > http://www.asplications.com.au/GenieWhitePaper.pdf. It describes how to > build a centralised business system deployed as web services, and so > consumed by thin clients, either IE or a dedicated rich Windows app. > > "Brian Schoenhofer" <bsch***@rogers.com> wrote in message > news:4ed35dcd.0411101117.30df52d7@posting.google.com... >> The company I work for has a requirement for a web application that >> will run on our public Internet servers but the same code base (more >> or less) should be able to be deployed and run on standalone desktop >> machines for about 4000 users. We need database support and dynamic >> pages backed by some middle tier business logic. >> >> Does anyone have any suggestions? Someone's mentioned a Java solution >> where a small app server could be distributed on everyone's machine >> and the main app could use a full fledged j2ee app server. I imagine >> this could be done with MS technology too using personal web server. >> Is there a better solution? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Brian > > We do not have intrinsic disconnected support, although we do have several
models of disconnected funtionality, based on the requirements and device capabilities (pc/tablet/PDA). Show quote "Dino Chiesa [Microsoft]" <din***@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:utp$slCzEHA.2876@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > when you say "standalone machines" - does this require disconnected > operation? In other words, the desktop machine is totally off the network, > should the app still work? > > I agree with Radek - why duplicate the business logic? instead, Re-use it > from different client types! > > > "Radek Cerny" <radek.cerny@asplications.nospam.com.au> wrote in message > news:u4QMoF5xEHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > > If the "Standalone" workstations are connected to the net, have a read of > > http://www.asplications.com.au/GenieWhitePaper.pdf. It describes how to > > build a centralised business system deployed as web services, and so > > consumed by thin clients, either IE or a dedicated rich Windows app. > > > > "Brian Schoenhofer" <bsch***@rogers.com> wrote in message > > news:4ed35dcd.0411101117.30df52d7@posting.google.com... > >> The company I work for has a requirement for a web application that > >> will run on our public Internet servers but the same code base (more > >> or less) should be able to be deployed and run on standalone desktop > >> machines for about 4000 users. We need database support and dynamic > >> pages backed by some middle tier business logic. > >> > >> Does anyone have any suggestions? Someone's mentioned a Java solution > >> where a small app server could be distributed on everyone's machine > >> and the main app could use a full fledged j2ee app server. I imagine > >> this could be done with MS technology too using personal web server. > >> Is there a better solution? > >> > >> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> Brian > > > > > > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||